The Slow Evolution of the “Transfer Committee”

Much has been made of Liverpool’s transfer committee since Fenway Sports Group bought the club in October 2010. The primary grievance is the inability of the committee to procure adequate squad improvements at rational prices, while the secondary fault emerges following the lack of impact made by those signings during the frantic attempt to offload those ailing players. With their desperation to sell palpable, and their negotiating power subsequently weakened, the club often has no option but to settle for a much-reduced fee.

During his three years at the club’s helm, Brendan Rodgers made twenty-six permanent first-team signings. Only two have been irrefutable successes: Daniel Sturridge and Philippe Coutinho, with the recent form of Roberto Firmino earning him an honourable mention too. Having arrived as young players with undoubted potential, Sturridge and Coutinho have blossomed. Now ranking among the better players in the league, the two would command considerably higher transfer fees if they were sold. They are, as a result, exemplary of the merits of the recruitment strategy implemented by FSG during their stewardship of the club.

Liverpool, however, would be unlikely to recoup the fees expended on many of the remaining twenty signings made during Rodgers’ tenure. Indeed, with a summer clear-out pending, Jürgen Klopp will likely adjudge such expensive signings as Christian Benteke, Mario Balotelli and Joe Allen to be unworthy of a place in his squad for next season, with the futures of Dejan Lovren, Adam Lallana and Lazar Marković also uncertain. Unless there unexpectedly arrives a welcome raid for those six players from the exponential spending of the Chinese Super League, Liverpool will be forced to settle for cut-price transfer fees for players that, having cost a combined £128.5m, have struggled to varying extents in their short Anfield careers.

The pitiful showing of such expensive signings raises serious questions about the lack of quality players secured at reasonable prices. The reality, though, is that this failure is symptomatic of the preference of the committee for players proven in the Premier League. It is baffling that there remain subscribers to the pretence that the superior entertainment factor of the Premier League equates to a player of higher calibre and thus of greater value. The reality is that the £25m spent on Adam Lallana, and the £20m spent on Dejan Lovren, for example, could have bought players of a greater quality elsewhere in Europe. These players were not worth then the enormous sums paid for their transfer, as reflected in the justifiable bemusement of the fans on their arrival, and their values have only decreased since.

More galling is that this business was conducted the summer before Liverpool would again compete in the Champions League. Even with the lure of Europe’s elite competition, the long-sought elixir framed by many as the remedy for Liverpool’s inability to compete with its rivals, the transfer committee continued to sanction the level of spending which ought to introduce leading stars and match-winners of Champions League calibre. Here, there can be no excuse.

To bitterly recount such disappointments with hindsight is ultimately futile, but there is rare cause for optimism nestled among the mass of mediocrity. There is potential in the current crop. Alberto Moreno and Mamadou Sakho have their critics but they, along with Emre Can, Divock Origi, Danny Ings, Nathaniel Clyne and, of course, Roberto Firmino, are capable of emulating Philippe Coutinho and Daniel Sturridge in blossoming into vital players at Liverpool.

This transfer policy occasionally delivers such immediately effective bargains as Sturridge and Coutinho, but it also requires patience with talented strugglers simply in need of support and experience. This was the case with Jordan Henderson, for example, who was bought at great expense and, in the fickle world of modern football, was almost offloaded soon after. Instead, he stayed and has become near indispensable at Anfield, gaining the captaincy in the process.

Encouragingly, it is not only the quality of signing that has been enhanced of late. Although injury has blighted the promising starts made by Danny Ings and Divock Origi, their signings contrast positively with those of Mario Balotelli, Rickie Lambert, and even Christian Benteke, in that they fit perfectly the footballing philosophies to which Rodgers and now Klopp subscribe. There is also a fresh approach to transfer dealings through which the club is now often able to eschew the relentless media speculation that accompanies more protracted negotiations. In summer, the club quietly pursued and swiftly confirmed targets such as Nathaniel Clyne, a significant upgrade on his predecessor, and the resplendent Roberto Firmino, who has contributed to more goals than any other Premier League player in 2016.

Moving forward, the committee must seek inspiration in its foremost successes, namely the exemplary signings of Daniel Sturridge and Philippe Coutinho. Despite being young players in the possession of unquestionable talent, they were naïvely overlooked at Chelsea and Inter Milan respectively. Liverpool proved to be the club that would foster their development, offering the first-team football they sought to enable them to reach their potential.

Embracing the risk, Liverpool handed the pair the platform that had too often been reserved for more experienced players at their former clubs, and they both thrived. Their early careers were marked by inconsistency, and thus limited opportunity in spite of their hints at brilliance. Comparisons can be drawn here with rumoured targets such as Real Madrid’s Jesé, who is predictably overlooked given the vast array of attacking options available to Zinedine Zidane.

Although it will occasionally frustrate, the policy of buying young potential is set to endure. It is, of course, significant to the economic strategy of the club, but it is also indicative of a status-quo in which Liverpool simply cannot compete for many established, quality players. While some signings will impress from the outset, the development of other promising players requires patience. The quality and suitability of those players is, however, much enhanced in recent years. With a renewed approach to transfer negotiations impressing of late, and an inspiring manager under whom such targets ought to be excited to develop, Liverpool can expect to enjoy a more fortuitous transfer window in the summer to come.

This article was first published by Anfield HQFor more, please follow @KopWriter on Twitter.


How The Europa League Could Salvage This Faltering Season

Uninspiring in defeat to Leicester City. An alarming capitulation against Sunderland. Extra-time heartbreak at West Ham. The early part of this decisive month has been greatly disappointing, but, crucially, it remains a month of great potential as Liverpool head to ‘Anfield South’ to face Manchester City for the chance to lift the season’s first major trophy in the Capital One Cup Final. Before that trip to Wembley, though, Liverpool must first overcome FC Augsburg if they are to book their place in the last-sixteen of the Europa League.

With Liverpool sat some twelve points adrift of the elusive top-four positions, any enduring prospect of Champions League qualification, at least by the conventional means, has been all but shattered for another year. Their next opponents in the Europa League, FC Augsburg, scraped through the Group Stage of the competition courtesy of their superior head-to-head record against FK Partizan, and they are struggling in the Bundesliga too, languishing just two points above the relegation play-off position. Led by a staff more than familiar with such opposition, Liverpool are therefore firm favourites to progress into the Round of 16. A renewed dedication to the Europa League from Jürgen Klopp’s side would then have the potential to salvage a thus far faltering season at Anfield, especially given that the reward on offer to the eventual winner is qualification for the Champions League in the following season.

This is an outlook likely shared by Jürgen Klopp who, on his appointment at Anfield, mocked the snobbish attitude of English football towards the increasingly competitive Europa League.

“The difference is not too big. If you play Champions League, you are playing Wednesday and Saturday. Where is the difference (with Thursday and Sunday)? Is the only benefit that you like the other tournament [Champions League] more?” – Jürgen Klopp, 6th November.

Yet despite the manager’s respect for the Europa League and his impressive record in European competition, Liverpool face a mammoth task in their attempts to win it. Although ranked among the favourites to win the tournament, the three-times winners are joined in the Round of 32 draw by such illustrious clubs as Manchester United, Klopp’s beloved Borussia Dortmund and Serie A front-runners Napoli, as well as Europa League experts Sevilla, who boast unparalleled pedigree in the competition having lifted the trophy a remarkable four times in the last ten years. However, the terrific domestic form of these high-flying sides could have a disastrous impact on their Europa League campaigns during the latter stages. As they each chase titles and European qualification in their respective leagues, their performance levels in the Europa League could understandably suffer, affording those teams who prioritise a total assault on the competition the opportunity to capitalise.

If Liverpool were to do just that, Jürgen Klopp could deliver a similarly enhanced level of preparation to that which bore incredible success for Brendan Rodgers’ side in the Premier League during the 2013/14 campaign. Paired with a sheer desire unmatched by a team whose energies are concentrated elsewhere, such preparation could produce an upset or two and, potentially, deliver Champions League football for next season via the only remaining route.

Whether in Europe or at home, the impacts of any potential cup triumph this early in the Klopp era would be two-fold. Firstly, the lifting of a trophy would provide a significant bonus in terms of recruitment. Not only would the club once again be in a position to offer transfer targets the opportunity to showcase their talents in the Champions League, but such early silverware would also serve, in itself, to embody the enormous potential of Klopp’s Anfield project. Secondly, and perhaps most crucially, the overcoming of recent big-match anxiety to deliver a trophy could subsequently prove to be an invaluable water-shed event; a coming-of-age moment from which this young squad would gain the experience and confidence required in order for it to challenge consistently for further titles in seasons to come. Should February see the hopes of another season prematurely extinguished, restless fans must not begin to doubt the scope for progress, but remember that cup success ought to have been considered a welcome bonus – not an expectation. Bring home a trophy, though, and a season so often written off as transitional would be remembered as one of remarkable success.

This article was first published by Anfield HQFor more, please follow @KopWriter on Twitter.